KUMVACHIRAPITAG

v.

MICROSOFT CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing, 564 U.S. 604 (U.S. 2011)
  …a different label. The Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eighth Circuits rejected the Manufacturers’ arguments and held that Mensing [*611] and Demahy’s claims were not pre-empted. See 588 F. 3d, at 614; 593 F. 3d, at 449. We granted certiorari, 562 U. S. 1104 (2010), consolidated the cases, and now reverse each. II Pre-emption analysis requires us to compare federal and state law. We therefore begin by identifying the state tort duties and federal labeling requirements applicable to the Manufacturers.…
• Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319 (U.S. 2011)
  …the defendant's need for rehabilitation in setting the length of the sentence. Ibid. We granted certiorari to consider whether § 3582(a) permits a sentencing court to impose or lengthen a prison term in order to foster a defendant’s rehabilitation. 562 U. S. 1104 (2010). That question has divided the Courts of Appeals.1 Because the United States agrees with Tapia’s interpretation of the statute, we appointed an amicus curiae to defend the judgment below.2 We now reverse. II We begin with statutory backgrou…
• Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co., 564 U.S. 50 (U.S. 2011)
  …ressly disagreed with the Seventh and Eighth Circuits, id., at 384-386 (discussing Illinois Bell Tel. Co. v. Box, 526 F. 3d 1069 (2008), and Southwestern Bell Tel., L. P. v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 530 F. 3d 676 (2008)).3 We granted certiorari, 562 U. S. 1104 (2010), and now reverse. II Petitioners contend that AT&T must lease its existing entrance facilities for interconnection at cost-based rates. We agree. A No statute or regulation squarely addresses whether an incumbent LEC must provide access t…