JACK LUPEI AND DONALD LUPEI, APPELLANTS,

v.

JAMES R. SPINK AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• ST. John v. State, 363 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …at there were other circumstances observed or otherwise known by the police which created the founded suspicion justifying the stop. The state relies upon several cases such as McRae v. State, 245 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1st DCA 1971), and Kaymore v. State, 260 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1st DCA 1972), to support the contention that the mere receipt of a bolo gives an officer the right to stop and detain an individual. A cursory reading of those cases would indicate that the question was never raised. Therefore, they can hardly…
• Theodoer Williams v. State, 260 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
  …PER CURIAM. This is a companion case to Kaymore v. State of Florida, this Court’s Case No. M-242, 260 So. 2d 851, opinion filed this day. The sole point raised in appellant’s brief submitted by his court-appointed counsel and in appellant’s pro se additional brief concerns the legality of the search of a vehicle. This point was resolved contrary to appellant’s…
• Golphin v. State, 293 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …ted sufficient basis for a reasonable belief that the occupants of the car committed the Blinker Bar robbery such as to permit the stopping of the car to make an arrest without a warrant under F.S. 901.15, F.S.A. Kaymore v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1972, 260 So. 2d 851; Lowe v. State, Fla.App.3rd, 1966, 191 So. 2d 303. Golphin cannot complain that the officer did not actually place him under arrest until after the stolen radio was observed. Once the car had been legally stopped, there could be no question of the p…

Authorities Cited

• Glaab v. Caudill, 236 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)