IN RE TAEK SANG YOON

U.S. | 2011-04-04
No. 10-8761
563 U.S. 917 Supreme Court of the United States (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. 34 (U.S. 2011)
    …deral law” referred to in § 2254(d)(1) is the law at the time of the state-court adjudication on the merits. Id., at 99. The dissenting judge contended that it is the law at the time the conviction becomes final. Id., at 108. We granted cer-tiorari. 563 U. S. 917 (2011). II Section 2254(d) of Title 28 U. S. C., as amended by AEDPA, provides: “An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any [*38]…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw