W. WIRT CULBERTSON ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
SAGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Saga Development Corporation challenged its 1970 tax assessment in Dade County on grounds that the assessed value did not reflect fair market value. The trial court set a lower valuation based on evidence that certain property restrictions and zoning limitations reduced the property's value, and the appellate court affirmed that judgment.
The trial court properly reduced the tax assessment, and its findings were adequately supported by the record. No reversible error occurred in the admission of the 1969 assessment amount, as it was used to explain the assessor's methodology rather than as proof of 1970 fair value.
[1] A prior year's tax assessment is not admissible as proof of the fair assessment for the current year.
[2] A tax assessment may be invalidated if the tax assessor or their subordinates fail to consider statutorily enumerated factors.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the property was zoned for both agricultural and general use (an interim zoning), and is below the flood criteria as established for Dade County, Florida. It appears in this case that Metropolitan Dade County had devised [sic] in 1969, through its publication of January 1970, restrictions as to the use of the bayfrontage and that the submerged land owned by the Plaintiff was rendered useless by virtue of a new bulkhead line as established in 1969.”
The trial court's finding establishing that property restrictions and zoning limitations reduced the property's fair market value.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSaga Development Corporation owned an unimproved tract of real property in Dade County. The property was zoned for both agricultural and general use (…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Zoning Restrictions cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in an action challenging the validity of a tax assessment. The defendant-appellant is Metropolitan Dade County through its taxing authorities. The plaintiff-appel-lee is the taxpayer-owner of an unimproved tract of real property located in Dade County. Since the trial court set a valuation on this tract which represented the property’s fair market value, the appellee was awarded a judgment which reduced its 1970 tax assessment.
The appellant presents two points for reversal. The first urges that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the amount of a prior year’s assessment. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Tropical Park, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 551. Our examination of the record reveals nothing that demonstrates or suggests that the amount of the 1969 assessment was introduced into evidence as proof of the fair assessment of the property for 1970. It does appear in the record that the plaintiff’s expert witness testified as to the amount of the 1969 assessment in discussing the methods used by the tax assessor’s office. However, no reversible error appears under this point.
The second point urges the insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the trial court. In its final judgment, the trial court found:
“The testimony and evidence educed in the cause revealed that the property was zoned for both agricultural and general use (an interim zoning), and is below the flood criteria as established for Dade County, Florida. It appears in this case that Metropolitan Dade County had devised [sic] in 1969, through its publication of January 1970, restrictions as to the use of the bayfrontage and that the submerged land owned by the Plaintiff was rendered useless by virtue of a new bulkhead line as established in 1969. It further appeared in this case that neither the Tax Assessor himself, nor the Acting Tax Assessor, participated in the assessing of this property as its valuations were determined by two employees and there is a lack of consideration of the enumerated factors set forth in Section 193.-021 [renumbered 193.011] Florida Statutes, [F.S.A.].”
Our review of the record convinces us that these findings are adequately supported by the record and should be affirmed. Cf. Simpson v. Merrill, Fla.1970, 234 So.2d 350; Homer v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 249 So.2d 491; R-C-B-S Corporation v. Walter, Fla.App.1969, 225 So.2d 426.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Simpson v. Roxie H. Merrill, 234 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 1970)
- Porter W. Homer v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc., 249 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
- Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Tropical Park Inc., 251 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- R-C-B-S Corp. v. Walter, 225 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Russell v. Atl. BAG & Paper Co., 225 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)