JOAN BROWN AND MELVYN BROWN, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOAN BROWN AND MELVYN BROWN, APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
261 So. 2d 539
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1972)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J„ concur.
MANN, J., dissents for reasons expressed by Judge Wigginton in Hamelmann v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1959, 113 So.2d 394. See also annotations 100 A.L.R.2d 525, 534 et seq.; 162 A.L.R. 1414.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. State, 284 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…„ concur. . See, e. g., 29 Fla.Jur., Search and Seizure, § 31, et seq. . (Fla.App.1959), 113 So. 2d 394. ., Constitution of the United States. See, also, § 12, Declaration of Rights, Fla.Const., F.S.A. . Indeed, in Brown v. State (Fla.App.1972), 261 So. 2d 539, decided without opinion, this court necessarily rejected Hamelmann. . 100 A.L.R.2d 525, 542 et seq. . See, Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964).…
Authorities Cited
- Hamelmann v. State, 113 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)