SETSER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. Cain, 565 U.S. 73 (U.S. 2012)
  …ose Ronquil-lo’s notes violated this Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963). The state trial court rejected Smith’s Brady claim, and the Louisiana Court of Appeal and Louisiana Supreme Court denied review. We granted cer-tiorari, 564 U. S. 1004 (2011), and now reverse. Under Brady, the State violates a defendant’s right to due process if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment. See 373 U. S., at 87. The State does not disp…
• Setser v. United States, 566 U.S. 231 (U.S. 2012)
  …District Court did have authority to order a consecutive sentence. 607 F. 3d, at 131-132. It also held that Setser⅛ sentence was reasonable, even if it was “ ‘partially foiled’ ” by the state court’s decision. Id., at 132-133. We granted certiorari, 564 U. S. 1004 (2011), and appointed an amicus curiae to brief and argue this case in support of the judgment below, 564 U. S. 1014 (2011). ⅜ — I HH Before proceeding further, it is important to be clear about what is at issue. Setser does not contend that his f…