IN RE WHERRY

Citator

Cited By

• Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins., 136 S. Ct. 1540 (U.S. 2016)
  …n "an individual." § 1681a(c). For purposes of this opinion, we assume that Spokeo is a consumer reporting agency. See Edwards v. First American Corp ., 610 F. 3d 514 (C.A.9 2010), cert. granted sub nom. First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards, 564 U.S. 1018, 131 S.Ct. 3022, 180 L.Ed.2d 843 (2011), cert. dism'd as improvidently granted, 567 U.S. ----, 132 S.Ct. 2536, 183 L.Ed.2d 611 (2012)(per curiam ). "That a suit may be a class action ... adds nothing to the question of standing, for even named plain…
• Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 284 (U.S. 2012)
  …recovery to pecuniary loss” is not “plausible,” id., at 1034. The Government petitioned for rehearing or rehearing en banc, but a divided court denied the petition. Id., at 1019. The Government then petitioned for certiorari, and we granted review. 564 U. S. 1018 (2011). i — I hH Because respondent seeks to recover monetary compensation from the Government for mental and emotional harm, we must decide whether the civil remedies provision of the Privacy Act waives the Government’s sovereign immunity with re…
• Frank v. Paloma Gaos, 139 S. Ct. 1041 (U.S. 2019)
  …te. 2012 WL 1094646, *3. After the District Court ruled on Google's second motion to dismiss, we granted certiorari in Edwards to address whether an alleged statutory violation alone can support standing. First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards , 564 U.S. 1018, 131 S.Ct. 3022, 180 L.Ed.2d 843 (2011). In the meantime, Gaos and an additional named plaintiff filed a second amended complaint against Google. Google once again moved to dismiss. Google argued that the named plaintiffs did not have standing to…