RH CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC ET AL.
v.
MAYER BROWN LLP ET AL.

U.S. | 2011-06-20
No. 10-535
564 U.S. 1018 Supreme Court of the United States (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins., 136 S. Ct. 1540 (U.S. 2016)
  • Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 284 (U.S. 2012)
    …recovery to pecuniary loss” is not “plausible,” id., at 1034. The Government petitioned for rehearing or rehearing en banc, but a divided court denied the petition. Id., at 1019. The Government then petitioned for certiorari, and we granted review. 564 U. S. 1018 (2011). i — I hH Because respondent seeks to recover monetary compensation from the Government for mental and emotional harm, we must decide whether the civil remedies provision of the Privacy Act waives the Government’s sovereign immunity with re…
  • Frank v. Paloma Gaos, 139 S. Ct. 1041 (U.S. 2019)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw