PLIVA, INC., ET AL.
v.
MENSING; ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC V. MENSING; ACTAVIS, INC. V. DEMAHY; STERN, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARSHALL V. MARSHALL, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARSHALL; PARKER V. RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; GARD ET UX. V. CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA; TALLEY V. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, ET AL.; AGNEW V. SUSSEX CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSN.; CONSTANT V. CALIFORNIA EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CAMPBELL V. KELLERMYER BUILDING SERVICES, LLC; CLELLAN V. OHIO; EDWARDS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY; WADSWORTH ET UX. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; DOE V. UNITED STATES; CATO V. SWARTHOUT, WARDEN; FULLER V. SMITH, MONROE V. KRIPPEL ET AL.; SPENCER V. ALABAMA; SIMON V. CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, ET AL.; MATSUDA V. HAWAII ET AL.; SMITH V. BUSS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; HENRY V. ALABAMA ET AL.; ROSS V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; QUATTROCCHI V. FLORIDA; VAN ZANT V. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION ET AL.; BOCZKOWSKI V. JACKSON ET AL.; CRISDON V. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; LYTLE V. NORTH CAROLINA; WEINRICH V. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; PETTUS V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; HEINONEN V. SCOTT; SIMON V. GEORGIA ET AL.; HALL V. BERGHUIS, WARDEN; HARRIS V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY & AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL COLLEGE; GOODMAN V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD; DIGSBY V. BUSS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KARUPAIYAN ET AL. V. BROWN ET AL.; CRIM V. BAYSHORE OF NAPLES, INC.; HAMILTON V. UNITED STATES; HEADE V. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY; TALLEY V. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, NEW JERSEY, ET AL.; BOZIC V. PENNSYLVANIA; DAVIS V. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; MCPHERRON V. DAILING ET AL.; FIGURA TORREFRANCA V. HORNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL.; AND FIGURA TORREFRANCA V. RYAN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; WOODWARD V. KANSAS; BLANCHARD V. BENNETT ET AL.; BOTANY V. HUIBREGTSE, WARDEN; BOOK V. MENDOZA ET AL.; BURGIN V. LAHAYE ET AL.; AKBAR V. PADULA, WARDEN; BRESTLE V. UNITED STATES; BREWINGTON V. WALSH, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT DALLAS, ET AL.; IN RE POIRIER, JARVIS V. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES & LEASING CO.; HINES V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a Supreme Court order disposing of approximately 50 petitions for certiorari and related motions in a single order, denying rehearing across multiple unrelated cases spanning diverse areas of law including pharmaceutical liability, constitutional law, administrative law, and criminal procedure.
[1] Petitions for rehearing are denied when the court does not grant them.
[2] A denial of a petition for rehearing signifies that the court has considered and rejected the request for reconsideration of its prior decision.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 604; ante, p. 604; ante, p. 604; ante, p. 462; ante, p. 1019; ante, p. 1005; ante, p. 1020; 563 U. S. 1022; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1039; 563 U. S. 1022; 563 U. S. 1034; ante, p. 1005; 563 U. S. 1035; 563 U. S. 943; 563 U. S. 1009; ante, p. 1022; 563 U. S. 964; 563 U. S. 977; 563 U. S. 977; 563 U. S. 992; ante, p. 1006; 563 U. S. 992; 563 U. S. 993; 563 U. S. 994; 563 U. S. 994; 563 U. S. 995; 563 U. S. 995; ante, p. 1023; 563 U. S. 1010; 563 U. S. 1010; 563 U. S. 996; 563 U. S. 1024; 563 U. S. 1012; 563 U. S. 1024; 563 U. S. 1036; 563 U. S. 1036; 563 U. S. 981; 563 U. S. 1037; 563 U. S. 1037; 563 U. S. 1025; 563 U. S: 1038; ante, p. 1030; ante, p. 1025; 563 U. S. 1038; 563 U. S. 1014; 563 U. S. 1038; ante, p. 1042; 563 U. S. 1038; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1043; 563 U. S. 1039; 563 U. S. 1020; ante, p. 1043; and ante, p.
1029. Petitions for rehearing denied. No. 10-1254. No. 10-1260. No. 10-1272. No. 10-1274. No. 10-1275. No. 10-1277. No. 10-1313. No. 10-1315. No. 10-1352. No. 10-7592. No. 10-8294. No. 10-8988. No. 10-9069. No. 10-9085. No. 10-9153. No. 10-9215. No. 10-9235. No. 10-9314. No. 10-9334. No. 10-9341. No. 10-9389. No. 10-9407. No. 10-9428. No. 10-9481. No. 10-9490. No. 10-9516. No. 10-9572. No. 10-9578. No. 10-9625. No. 10-9706. No. 10-9710. No. 10-9720. No. 10-9787. No. 10-9813. No. 10-9816. No. 10-9829. No. 10-9884. No. 10-9893. No. 10-10005. No. 10-10068. No. 10-10095. No. 10-10096. No. 10-10103. No. 10-10104. No. 10-10155. No. 10-10163. No. 10-10166. No. 10-10228. No. 10-10243. No. 10-10327. No. 10-10461. No. 10-10601.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (41 total)
- In re Disbarment of Stanton, 563 U.S. 1020 (U.S. 2011)
- Cruz Lopez v. California, 563 U.S. 964 (U.S. 2011)
- Lacy v. Arkansas, 563 U.S. 964 (U.S. 2011)
- LeClaire v. Pallito, 563 U.S. 977 (U.S. 2011)
- Mills v. Wisconsin, 563 U.S. 981 (U.S. 2011)
- Grote v. United States, 563 U.S. 981 (U.S. 2011)
- Clifton v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 563 U.S. 992 (U.S. 2011)
- Barnes v. IMS Mgmt., LLC, 563 U.S. 992 (U.S. 2011)
- Manseau et ux. v. City of Miramar, 563 U.S. 993 (U.S. 2011)
- Cunningham v. Palmer, 563 U.S. 993 (U.S. 2011)