JOHN D. LUECK AND GUY MEMOLI, APPELLANTS,

v.

LEDO LINES, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …3 (citation omitted; emphasis in original). Other Third District cases in which there is discussion of "detriment” based on the facts of the particular case include Walfish v. Wolfish, 383 So. 2d 274, 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and Stewart v. Stewart, 261 So. 2d 864, 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). . This court has, to be sure, outlined particular factual circumstances when detriment must be shown. See Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). But, as the above-cited cases show, a showing of "detriment” is no…
• Arie Lionel Bosem v. Bosem, 269 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …e children become twenty-one years old. See Perla v. Perla, Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d 689. Additionally, the medical provision should be limited to the payment for other than usual and minor medical bills. Cf. Stewart v. Stewart, Fla.App.1972, 3rd D.C.A., 261 So. 2d 864, filed May 9, 1972. As reasonable and intelligent people, the appellant and the appellee can probably determine what is major and unusual, but if this is not possible, the court may be called upon to decide. The requirement that the husband maintai…
• Berlin v. Dawna Michele Berlin, 386 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …e in custody where there are aggravating circumstances, such as: alienation of affection, Brust v. Brust, 275 So. 2d 598 (Fla.1st DCA 1973); or where such frustration is accompanied by a vengeful attitude of the custodial parent, Stewart v. Stewart, 261 So. 2d 864 (Fla.3d DCA 1972). No suggestion is made nor does the record disclose such aggravating factors in this case. THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN Of all the criteria prescribed by Section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (1979), the best interests of the…

Authorities Cited

• City OF Mount Dora v. Gertrude Voorhees, 115 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)