STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

ARMER E. WHITE ET AL., (PARCEL 103) (E. P. SANDERS, JR. AND FRANCES M. SANDERS, HIS WIFE) (CHERRY LAKE ORCHARDS, INC.), APPELLEES; STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. ARMER E. WHITE ET AL., (PARCEL 102) (R. M. SCRUGGS AND DORIS SCRUGGS, HIS WIFE), APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Cummings v. Cummings, 330 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1976)
  …1971). . 263 So.2a 588 (Fla.App.1972). . 277 So. 2d 583 (Fla.App.1973). . Id. at 585. . Naf v. Wahlberg, 288 So. 2d 576 (Fla.App. 1974) ; Steinhmer, supra, see Note 4. . Gordon v. Gordon, supra, see Note 2., . 287 So. 2d 691 (Fla.App.1973). . 262 So. 2d 269, 272 (Fla.App.1972).…
• Brown v. Brown, 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …that provided by her husband during coverture, if he has the ability to pay.” An in-depth review of this Court’s decisions after the 1971 statutory changes is now in order to determine the current status of alimony in our state. In Beard v. Beard, 262 So. 2d 269 (Fla.App. 1st 1972), the trial court found (as is probably true in more than 90 percent of marriage failures) that although neither party was without fault, “the preponderance of the equities lies with appellant husband and he is entitled to a divor…
• Tedford J. Cann v. Margery M. Cann, 334 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …ainder of her life unassisted by the former husband, then the courts cannot require him to pay alimony other than for rehabilitative purposes.” (Roberts v. Roberts, Fla. App. 1st 1973, 283 So. 2d 396, 397; see also Beard v. Beard, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 262 So. 2d 269; and Thigpen v. Thigpen, Fla.App. 1st 1973, 277 So. 2d 583) The public policy of the State would be utterly frustrated by an award of permanent alimony where it affirmatively appears that the wife has not only the capacity but also the desire to be…