IN RE TAYLOR

Citator

Cited By

• Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 566 U.S. 624 (U.S. 2012)
  …eed; and because petitioners did not allege any splitting of fees it granted summary judgment in favor of respondent. A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. 626 F..3d 799 (2010). We granted certiorari. 565 U. S. 941 (2011). HH I — I The question in this case pertains to the scope of § 2607(b), which as we have said provides that “[n]o person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the renderin…
• Blueford v. Arkansas, 566 U.S. 599 (U.S. 2012)
  ….court did not err in denying Blueford’s request for new verdict forms that would have allowed the jury to render a partial verdict on the charges of capital and first-degree murder. Blueford sought review in this Court, and we granted cer-tiorari. 565 U. S. 941 (2011). II The Double Jeopardy Clause provides that no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” U. S. Const., Arndt. 5. The Clause “guarantees that the State shall not be permitted to make repeate…