ROSA MAE BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROSA MAE BROWN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
262 So. 2d 741
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murray v. Hidden Lake Dev. Corp., 281 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…urt erred in construing the sum specified in the contract as liquidated damages as opposed to a penalty. This cause previously was before this court upon a closely related issue. See State ex rel. Hidden Lake Development Corp. v. Vann, Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 741. It was there determined that this cause was properly an action for liquidated damages. Appellant’s claim that actual damages must be proved in order to establish that the liquidated damages are not a penalty is refuted by the holding in Hutchison v…
-
Brown v. State, 268 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 1972)…Certiorari dismissed. 262 So. 2d 741. CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J, dissents.…