RUPERT L. RACKLEY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE N. MATHEWS, DECEASED,
v.
EDITHA MATHEWS SLADE, ET VIR.

Fla. | 1940-01-09
Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur., Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
141 Fla. 310 Florida Supreme Court (1940) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 193 So. 70
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Rupert L. Rackley as Administrator, etc., v. Louise Mathews, filed at this term of Court, and the decree herein is affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Joseph v. State, 447 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …in a companion case over which the court has lost jurisdiction. Indeed, until today I thought it axiomatic that controlling decisions in such companion cases were binding on the court under the doctrine of stare decisis. See e.g., Rackley v. Slade, 141 Fla. 310, 193 So. 70 (1940); Balzebre v. 2600 Douglas, Inc., 273 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Chatmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 268 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Metropolitan Dade County v. E.B. Elliott Advertising Co., 214 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DC…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw