VAN AUKEN, TRUSTEE
v.
WIRTH ET AL.; VAN AUKEN, BENEFICIARY V. WIRTH ET AL.; CARROLL V. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; PLANEY V. PLANEY; TAYLOR V. TAYLOR ET AL.; QUINONES V. NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES, INC., ET AL.; ABELL V. WILSON; HOLBROOK V. CASTLE KEY INSURANCE CO., FKA ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INSURANCE CO., ET AL.; DUFF ET UX. V. LEWIS; LANG V. GUNDY, WARDEN; WRIGHT V. BELL, WARDEN; WINTERS V. UNITED STATES; MOORE V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, ET AL.; BERTOLA V. HARTLEY, WARDEN; BATSHEVER V. JAFAR ET AL.; BUSH V. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL.; EFFRON V. UNITED STATES; SHEPARD V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. MICHIGAN; PARTOVI V. GALOSKI ET AL.; JOLICOEUR-VASSEUR V. ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT ATTENDANTS ET AL.; PEREZ SALDANA V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BUTLER V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; ZABRISKIE V. HESS, INC., ET AL.; SAUCHELLI V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET AL.; TORRES V. HARTLEY, WARDEN; ARMSTRONG V. BENITO; DOWNS V. CALIFORNIA; HAWKINS V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; GALLAHER V. SOUTHERN TUBE FORM, LLC, ET AL.; CORTES V. UNITED STATES; BLAKE V. MALEY; BURT V. UNITED STATES; REECE V. WALDEN AFFORDABLE, LLC, ET AL.; BRAYBOY V. ROBESON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; NAKAGAWA V. NORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH; MAKDESSI V. WATSON, WARDEN; MITCHELL V. LEMPKE, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; JARVIS V. MARYLAND; KAVEL V. MARSHALL, WARDEN; MCMAHAN V. TEXAS; WINKLER V. CLEMENTS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; DANIEL V. LONG ISLAND HOUSING PARTNERSHIP, INC., ET AL.; LIBAN V. MIDDLEBROOK AT MONMOUTH; KORDA V. BOUCHARD, SHERIFF, OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN, ET AL.; PUCHE ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; KLIESH V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., ET AL.; JARVIS V. GRADY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.; MOORE V. ILLINOIS; RICKS V. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK CO. ET AL.; GLEASON V. CALIFORNIA; BOOK V. TOBIN ET AL.; STURDZA V. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES ET AL.; STURDZA V. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES ET AL.; ASH V. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM ET AL.; EL GHANNAM V. SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC. ET AL.; SINGLETON V. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA ET AL.; STRATTON V. TEXAS (FIVE JUDGMENTS); POLITE V. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; REA V. WAL-MART STORE 1105; BUENROSTRO, AKA ROSTRO V. UNITED STATES; OGUNSALU V. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, ET AL.; SLOVINEC V. MEISBURG; TAYLOR V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; MANGUAL V. UNITED STATES, IN RE COUCH

U.S. | 2011-11-28
Nos. 10-1217; No. 10-1325; No. 10-1336; No. 10-1453; No. 10-1455; No. 10-1458; No. 10-1469; No. 10-1490; No. 10-1547; No. 10-9509; No. 10-9996; No. 10-10220; No. 10-10223; No. 10-10231; No. 10-10368; No. 10-10374; No. 10-10397; No. 10-10412; No. 10-10414; No. 10-10416; No. 10-10501; No. 10-10565; No. 10-10586; No. 10-10641; No. 10-10681; No. 10-10684; No. 10-10693; No. 10-10719; No. 10-10752; No. 10-10760; No. 10-10878; No. 10-10912; No. 10-10983; No. 10-10991; No. 10-10999; No. 10-11008; No. 10-11013; No. 10-11033; No. 10-11057; No. 10-11142; No. 10-11148; No. 10-11151; No. 10-11242; No. 11-55; No. 11-108; No. 11-200; No. 11-201; No. 11-5082; No. 11-5115; No. 11-5224; No. 11-5271; No. 11-5295; No. 11-5304; No. 11-5307; No. 11-5360; No. 11-5502; No. 11-5507; No. 11-5526; No. 11-5571; No. 11-5650; No. 11-5711; No. 11-5760; No. 11-5800; No. 11-5934; No. 11-6020; No. 11-6128
565 U.S. 1074 Supreme Court of the United States (2011)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for rehearing may be denied.

[2] The denial of a petition for rehearing is a procedural ruling.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 815; ante, p. 815; ante, p. 817; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 823; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 827; ante, p. 829; ante, p. 830; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 841; No. 10-10641. No. 10-10681. No. 10-10684. No. 10-10693. No. 10-10719. No. 10-10752. No. 10-10760. No. 10-10878. No. 10-10912. No. 10-10983. No. 10-10991. No. 10-10999. No. 10-11008. No. 10-11013. No. 10-11033. No. 10-11057. No. 10-11142. No. 10-11148. No. 10-11151. No. 10-11242. No. 11-55. No. 11-108. No. 11-200. No. 11-201. No. 11-5082. No. 11-5115. ante, p. 842; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 846; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 862; ante, p. 862; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 874; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 884; ante, p. 963; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 890; No. 11-5224. No. 11-5271. No. 11-5295. No. 11-5304. No. 11-5307. No. 11-5360. No. 11-5502. No. 11-5507. No. 11-5526. No. 11-5571. No. 11-5650. No. 11-5711. No. 11-5760. No. 11-5800. No. 11-5934. No. 11-6020. No. 11-6128. ante, p. 896; ante, p. 898; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 914; ante, p. 948; ante, p. 919; ante, p. 950; ante, p. 922; ante, p. 952; ante, p. 927; and ante, p. 940. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw