HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL
v.
MARTINEZ GUTIERREZ; AND HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL V. SAWYERS

U.S. | 2012-01-06
Nos. 10-1542; No. 10-1543
565 U.S. 1104 Supreme Court of the United States (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 567 U.S. 182 (U.S. 2012)
    …contractor for the full contract amount. Judge Hartz dissented, contending that Congress intended to set a maximum limit on the Government’s liability for contract support costs. We granted certiorari to resolve a split among the Courts of Appeals, 565 U. S. 1104 (2012), and now affirm.2 [*189] I—! A In evaluating the Government’s obligation to pay tribes for contract support costs, we do not write on a clean slate. Only seven years ago, in Cherokee Nation, we also considered the Government’s promise to pa…
  • …(1953) ; Bridges v. Wixon , 326 U.S. 135, 148, 65 S.Ct. 1443, 89 L.Ed. 2103 (1945) ; Yick Wo v. Hopkins , 118 U.S. 356, 369, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886) ; cf. Bluman v. Federal Election Comm'n , 800 F. Supp. 2d 281, 286-289 (DDC 2011), aff 'd, 565 U.S. 1104, 132 S.Ct. 1087, 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012). And so too, the Court has ruled that, under some circumstances, foreign citizens in the U. S. Territories-or in "a territory" under the "indefinite" and "complete and total control" and "within the constan…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw