HAMPEL
v.
UNITED STATES
HAMPEL
UNITED STATES
565 U.S. 1153
Supreme Court of the United States (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Williams, 568 U.S. 289 (U.S. 2013)…lliams’ Sixth Amendment claim de novo, the Ninth Circuit applied its own precedent and held that the questioning and dismissal of Juror 6 violated the Sixth Amendment. 646 F. 3d, at 646-647. We granted the warden’s petition for a writ of certiorari, 565 U. S. 1153 (2012), in order to decide whether the Ninth Circuit erred by refusing to afford AEDPA deference to the California Court of Appeal’s decision. [*298] II A As noted above, AEDPA sharply limits the circumstances in which a federal court may issue a…
-
United States v. Bormes, 568 U.S. 6 (U.S. 2012)…es its requirements, 15 U. S. C. § 1681n(a), and the Act elsewhere defines “person” to include “any . . . government,” § 1681a(b). 626 F. 3d, at 580. The Federal Circuit remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. We granted certiorari, 565 U. S. 1153 (2012). r"H HH Sovereign immunity shields the United States from suit absent a consent to be sued that is ‘“unequivocally ex [*10] pressed.’ ” United States v. Nordic Village, Inc., 503 U. S. 30, 33-34 (1992) (quoting Irwin v. Department of Vetera…