KELLY
v.
WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS ET AL.; ESSETT V. UNITED STATES; HARDY, WARDEN V. CROSS; FOX V. WARDY ET AL.; SAWYER V. WORCESTER ET AL.; DIXON V. HENNEPIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT ET AL.; CARSON V. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL; HINES V. TENNESSEE; JACOBSON ET AL. V. SCHWARZENEGGER ET AL.; KALFOUNTZOS V. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD; HIRSCH V. ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY ET AL.; SCHIED V. WARD ET AL., IN RE SCHIED, SCHIED V. SNYDER ET AL.; AGUIRREZ MATOS V. TUCKER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BRADLEY V. CONNECTICUT; MCDOWELL V. MISSISSIPPI ET AL.; HOLLINS V. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, ET AL.; FORNESS V. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; LANCASTER V. BIGELOW, WARDEN, ET AL.; ROLON V. BEACON COS. ET AL.; KING V. TEXAS; DOSSETT V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; CASH V. LOUISIANA; CLARK V. UNITED STATES; CASTON-GOODJOHN V. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; NAJAFIAN V. CAPITAL ONE N. A. ET AL.; ROSEN V. NORTH SHORE TOWERS APARTMENTS, INC.; MOYA-FELICIANO V. TUCKER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; DYDZAK V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; MASON V. GODINEZ, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; BRADDOCK V. RAPELJE, WARDEN; CARLSON V. DOOLEY, WARDEN, IN RE SINGH, BUCK V. UNITED STATES; ISRAEL V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES; MARTIN V. WISCONSIN; HARRIS V. UNITED STATES; PURPURA ET AL. V. SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.; CEGLEDI V. UNITED STATES; GIRARD V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a Supreme Court order denying petitions for rehearing in 43 separate cases decided during the 2011 term. The document is a docket list with case citations and internal cross-references, containing no substantive legal analysis.
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 826; ante, p. 1058; ante, p. 65; ante, p. 945; No. 11-358. No. 11-490. No. 11-575. No. 11-5315. No. 11-5384. No. 11-5606. No. 11-5718. No. 11-5937. No. 11-5945. No. 11-6015. No. 11-6187. No. 11-6336. No. 11-6386. No. 11-6395. No. 11-6402. No. 11-6577. No. 11-6591. No. 11-6592. No. 11-6620. No. 11-6679. No. 11-6681. No. 11-6703. No. 11-6708. No. 11-6724. No. 11-6771. ante, p. 1060; ante, p. 1094; ante, p. 1101; ante, p. 1080; ante, p. 1080; ante, p. 980; ante, p. 1063; ante, p. 981; ante, p. 975; ante, p. 982; ante, p. 1016; ante, p. 1039; ante, p. 1040; ante, p. 1040; ante, p. 1017; ante, p. 1041; ante, p. 1066; ante, p. 1066; ante, p. 1067; ante, p. 1082; ante, p. 994; ante, p. 1042; ante, p. 1082; ante, p. 1083; ante, p. 1068; No. 11-6775. No. 11-6801. No. 11-6848. No. 11-6869. No. 11-6889. No. 11-6911. No. 11-6989. No. 11-7026. No. 11-7094. No. 11-7163. No. 11-7275. No. 11-7291. No. 11-7873. ante, p. 1095; ante, p. 1068; ante, p. 1096; ante, p. 1069; ante, p. 1013; ante, p. 1044; ante, p. 1070; ante, p. 1071; ante, p. 1084; ante, p. 1086; ante, p. 1127; ante, p. 1099; and ante, p. 1172. Petitions for rehearing denied.