EVERETT BONEY
v.
STATE
In this case plaintiff in error was convicted of the larceny of a domestic animal, to-wit, a three-legged, unmarked and unbranded, bull.
Plaintiff in error has presented six questions in brief and the case has been argued by his counsel before this Court.
After consideration of the record in the light of oral agrument on behalf of plaintiff in error and in behalf of the State, we find no reversible error reflected. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.
*416So ordered.
Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Celotex Corp. v. Carmella Meehan, 523 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1988)…a cause of action has arisen is made in accordance with the law of this state. Meehan, 466 So. 2d at 1101 (citing Colhoun v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 265 So. 2d 18 (Fla. [*145] 1972); Farris & Co. v. William Schluderberg, T.J. Kurdle Co., 141 Fla. 462,193 So. 429 (1940); Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), review denied, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla.1984)). In construing section 95.10, the district court reasoned that a cause of action in tort arises in the jurisdiction where the last…
-
Carmella Meehan v. The Celotex Corp., 466 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…), the determination of where a “cause of action arose” is made in accordance with the law of the forum state, (here Florida), Colhoun, 265 So. 2d 18; Pledger, 432 So. 2d 1323, see Farris & Co. v. William Schluderberg, T.J. Kurdle Co., 141 Fla. 462, 193 So. 429 (1940), rather than New York, the state apparently deemed by the trial court to [*1102] have the most significant relationship to the occurrence and to the parties.1 Under the thus applicable Florida law, a cause of action in tort “arises in the ju…
-
Sperry Rand Corp. v. Indus. Supply Corp., 337 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1964)…on Conflict of Laws 497, § 187. The only decision of a Florida court which has come to our attention involving a question as to the law applicable in an action on an implied warranty is Farris & Co. v. William Schluderberg, etc. Co., 141 Fla. 462, 193 So. 429, reh. den. 142 Fla. 765, 196 So. 184. A Florida vendor agreed by a contract executed in Maryland to sell and deliver in Maryland meat to be shipped from Florida. The place of contracting and the place of performance were the same. The court held tha…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence