CITY OF ORLANDO, APPELLANT,
v.
TEMPEST STORM ET AL., APPELLEES
CITY OF ORLANDO, APPELLANT,
TEMPEST STORM ET AL., APPELLEES
263 So. 2d 832
Florida Supreme Court (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cause dismissed ex mero motu.
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Soll v. Dayl M. Soll, 560 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…ed. . Nothing in this opinion precludes the trial court from retaining jurisdiction to make an award of alimony in the future should a change in circumstances require that result. Greene v. Greene, 256 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 263 So. 2d 832 (Fla.1972).…
-
Greenstein v. Greenstein, 479 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…inently fair to both parties. We do hold that the lower court should have retained jurisdiction over the cause to permit an alimony award if it should be required in the future. Greene v. Greene, 256 So. 2d 258, 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 263 So. 2d 832 (Fla.1972). With that small modification, the judgment below, as well as the subsequent orders allowing the wife attorney’s fees and interest, are enthusiastically Affirmed. . At oral argument, the husband’s counsel conceded, as was obvious in…