DAVID HAYBORN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID HAYBORN, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
264 So. 2d 112
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1972)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis there, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Cotton v. State, Third District Court of Appeal, 261 So.2d 179, opinion filed April 25, 1972; see also Killingsworth v. State, 1925, 90 Fla. 299, 105 So. 834; Sanders v. State, Fla.App.1971, 241 So.2d 430, and York v. State, Fla.App.1969, 232 So.2d 767.
Affirmed.
REED, C. J, and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Brown v. Brown, 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…postmarriage period to maintain the recipient until he or she is, in the exercise of reasonable efforts and endeavors, in a position of self-support. (See Primato v. Primato, Fla.App. 3d 1973, 274 So. 2d 568) In Lefler v. Lefler, Fla.App. 4th 1972, 264 So. 2d 112, our sister court of the Fourth District said: “ * * * We have the view, however, that no matter which direction the flow of alimony may take, its basic nature and purpose remains the same as heretofore, i. e., to provide nourishment, sustenance an…
-
Tedford J. Cann v. Margery M. Cann, 334 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…intenance of a spouse during his or her lifetime. Its purpose is to provide nourishment, sustenance and the necessities of life to a former spouse who has neither the resources nor ability to be self-sustaining. (Lefler v. Lefler, Fla.App. 4th 1972, 264 So. 2d 112) However, “permanent” does not necessarily mean “forever”. (Ruhnau v. Ruhnau, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 299 So. 2d 61) A significant distinction between rehabilitative alimony and permanent alimony relates to the manner by which it may be terminated. Reha…
-
Manly W. Thigpen v. Thigpen, 277 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)…ROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur. . Chapter 71-241, Laws of 1971; F.S., Chapter 61, F.S.A. . Beard v. Beard, (Fla.App.1972) 262 So. 2d 269, 272. .Kahn v. Kahn, (Fla.1955) 78 So. 2d 367, 368. . Lefler v. Lefler, (Fla.App.1972) 264 So. 2d 112, 113, 114; see also Heller v. Heller, (Fla.App.1963) 151 So. 2d 35.…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Killingsworth v. State, 90 Fla. 299 (Fla. 1925)
- York v. State, 232 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
- Cotton v. State, 261 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Sanders v. State, 241 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)