PORTER W. HOMER, AS COUNTY MANAGER, TAX ASSESSOR AND TAX COLLECTOR OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
PALM CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Taxing Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER ON MANDATE
Whereas, the judgment of this court was issued on February 9, 1971 (243 So.2d 641) reversing the final judgment of the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and
Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 26, 1972 (261 So.2d 822) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the final judgment of the trial court;
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on February 25, 1971 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed February 9, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the final judgment of the circuit court ap*121pealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A. R., 32 F.S.A.).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mallard v. Tele-Trip Co., 398 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…r may not have the property owner’s actual income figures, if he has such data as would aid in determining the assessment, he would be remiss if he did not consider it. Palm Corporation v. Homer, 261 So. 2d 822, 823 (Fla.1972), reh. den., on remand, 264 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); see also, Cassaday v. McKinney, 296 So. 2d 94, 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The use of the minimum rent by the appellant in computing the assessment on Tele-Trip’s leasehold interest is not inconsistent with Section 624.520, and it is…
Authorities Cited
- Palm Corp. v. Porter W. Homer, 261 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 1972)
- Porter W. Homer v. Palm Corp., 243 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)