FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST AMERICAN CORP., ET AL.
v.
EDWARDS
FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST AMERICAN CORP., ET AL.
EDWARDS
567 U.S. 756
Supreme Court of the United States (2012)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 183 L. Ed. 2d 611 · 132 S. Ct. 2536 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4875 · SCDB 2011-080
Cited by 7 cases
Per_curiam
[*757] Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins., 136 S. Ct. 1540 (U.S. 2016)…gency. See Edwards v. First American Corp ., 610 F. 3d 514 (C.A.9 2010), cert. granted sub nom. First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards, 564 U.S. 1018, 131 S.Ct. 3022, 180 L.Ed.2d 843 (2011), cert. dism'd as improvidently granted, 567 U.S. ----, 132 S.Ct. 2536, 183 L.Ed.2d 611 (2012)(per curiam ). "That a suit may be a class action ... adds nothing to the question of standing, for even named plaintiffs who represent a class 'must allege and show that they personally have been injured, not that injury has…
-
Frank v. Paloma Gaos, 139 S. Ct. 1041 (U.S. 2019)…leged violation of a statutory right. But because this Court had agreed to review Edwards , Google explained that it would continue to challenge the District Court's conclusion. We eventually dismissed Edwards as improvidently granted, 567 U.S. 756, 132 S.Ct. 2536, 183 L.Ed.2d 611 (2012) (per curiam ), and Google then withdrew its argument that Gaos lacked standing for the SCA claims. Gaos' putative class action was consolidated with a similar complaint, and the parties negotiated a classwide settlement. The…1 / 2