COMCAST CORP. ET AL.

v.

BEHREND ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sebelius v. Auburn Reg'l Med. Ctr., 568 U.S. 145 (U.S. 2013)
  …ment determinations, the Court of Appeals held, finding nothing in the statutory provision for PRRB review indicating that Congress intended to disallow equitable tolling. 642 F. 3d, at 1149-1151. We granted the Secretary’s petition for certiorari, 567 U. S. 933 (2012), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals over whether the 180-day time limit in 42 U. S. C. § 1395oo(a)(3) constricts the Board’s jurisdiction. Compare 642 F. 3d 1145 (case below); Western Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Heckler, 783 F…
• Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85 (U.S. 2013)
  …t. Id., at 97. Given that Already “ha[d] not asserted any intention to market any such shoe,” the court concluded that Already could not show any continuing injury, and that therefore no justiciable controversy remained. Ibid. We granted certiorari. 567 U. S. 933 (2012). II Article III of the Constitution grants the Judicial Branch authority to adjudicate “Cases” and “Controversies.” In our system of government, courts have “no business” deciding legal disputes or expounding on law in the absence of such a…
• Decker v. Nw. Env't Def. Ctr., 568 U.S. 597 (U.S. 2013)
  …Court of Appeals thus ruled that the discharges were from point sources and not exempt from the NPDES permitting scheme by the Industrial Stormwater Rule. It followed that petitioners had been in violation of the Act. This Court granted certiorari. 567 U. S. 933 (2012). H-f Before proceeding to the merits, it is necessary to consider two jurisdictional questions. A Respondent NEDC invoked the jurisdiction of the District Court under 33 U. S. C. § 1365(a), which “authorize^] private enforcement of the p…