M. H.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2012-06-25
No. 11-1026
567 U.S. 934 Supreme Court of the United States (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fla. Dep't OF Revenue v. Directv, Inc., 215 So. 3d 46 (Fla. 2017)
    …o satellite providers); DIRECTV Inc. v. Levin, 128 Ohio St.3d 68, 941 N.E. 2d 1187, 1196 (2010) (explaining that "the cable industry is not a local interest benefited at the expense of out-of-state competitors”), cert. denied, DIRECTV Inc. v. Testa, 567 U.S. 934, 133 S.Ct. 51, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012); DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax Comm'n, 364 P. 3d 1036, 1046-47 (Utah 2015) (finding that cable providers are not "in-state” and satellite providers are not "out-of-state” for Commerce Clause purposes).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw