DAVIS
v.
UNITED STATES; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; BRAZELL V. UNITED STATES; HYDE V. UNITED STATES; LEWIS V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; COX V. UNITED STATES; MERRIMAN V. UNITED STATES; AND WRIGHT V. UNITED STATES; GRIFFIN V. UNITED STATES; KING V. UNITED STATES; CAIN V. UNITED STATES; NEWCOMB V. UNITED STATES; PARKER V. UNITED STATES; HOLCOMB ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; MOORE V. UNITED STATES; RICKMON V. UNITED STATES; BAGU V. UNITED STATES; MOSES V. UNITED STATES; VANCE V. UNITED STATES; BROWN V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; AND TOWNSEND V. UNITED STATES; TICKLES, AKA TICKLESS V. UNITED STATES; WALKER V. UNITED STATES; WILKS V. UNITED STATES; SIDNEY V. UNITED STATES; LEWIS V. UNITED STATES; JONES V. UNITED STATES; GIBSON V. UNITED STATES; WATSON V. UNITED STATES; STROWDER V. UNITED STATES; BRITO V. UNITED STATES; DOUGLAS V. UNITED STATES; BOOMER V. UNITED STATES; GIBBS V. UNITED STATES; RAYSOR V. UNITED STATES; JORDAN V. UNITED STATES; AKIWOWO V. UNITED STATES; BAXTER ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; BENITEZ V. UNITED STATES; COLEMAN V. UNITED STATES; BENNETT V. UNITED STATES; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; OWENS V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in forty consolidated cases involving federal criminal convictions and vacated the lower court judgments, remanding them for reconsideration in light of the Court's decision in Dorsey v. United States, which addressed sentencing disparities under federal law.
[1] Motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted.
[2] Certiorari is granted when cases are remanded for further consideration in light of a Supreme Court decision.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 422 Fed. Appx. 544; C. A. 8th Cir.; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 415 Fed. Appx. 727;
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 426 Fed. Appx. 458;
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 426 Fed. Appx. 467; No. 11-7043. No. 11-7328. No. 11-7500. No. 11-7505. No. 11-7558. No. 11-7650. No. 11-7689. No. 11-7728. No. 11-7879. No. 11-8023. No. 11-8026. No. 11-8063. No. 11-8134. No. 11-8146. No. 11-8244. No. 11-8268. No. 11-8355. No. 11-8413. No. 11-8476. No. 11-8551. No. 11-8737. No. 11-8778.
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 422 Fed. Appx. 544; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 423 Fed. Appx. 647; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 437 Fed. Appx. 500; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 461 Fed. Appx. 517; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 436 Fed. Appx. 708; C. A. 3d Cir.; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 434 Fed. Appx. 563; (Reported below: 659 F. 3d 613); (662 F. 3d 457); C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 661 F. 3d 212; C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 471 Fed. Appx. 92; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 648 F. 3d 904; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 444 Fed. Appx. 908; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 661 F. 3d 212; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 434 Fed. Appx. 569; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 449 Fed. Appx. 506; C. A. 8th Cir.; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 453 Fed. Appx. 334; C. A. 4th Cir.; No. 11-8894. No. 11-9016. No. 11-9028. No. 11-9029. No. 11-9142. No. 11-9604. No. 11-9711. No. 11-9938. No. 11-9961.
C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 661 F. 3d 987;
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 440 Fed. Appx. 508; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 456 Fed. Appx. 446; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 445 Fed. Appx. 642; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 664 F. 3d 997; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 466 Fed. Appx. 383; and C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 466 Fed. Appx.
388. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Dorsey v. United States, ante, p. 260.