SHATTERPROOF GLASS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PETITIONER,

v.

R. P. BUCKMASTER AND NATIONAL GLASS COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 472 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …fits under Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). See Tucker v. Florida Department of Commerce, 366 So. 2d 845, 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Williams v. State of Florida, Department of Commerce, 260 So. 2d 233, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 264 So. 2d 427 (Fla.1972); Spaulding v. Florida Industrial Commission, 154 So. 2d 334, 338-39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). In this respect, we reject the referee’s legal conclusion that there were two fights in this case and that the claimant caused the “second” fight by…
• Turnberry Isle Resort & Club v. Madoc D. Fernandez, 666 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …Law, which is ‘remedial, humanitarian legislation ... [that] should be liberally and broadly construed.’ ” Herman, 323 So. 2d at 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) (quoting Williams v. State, Dep’t of Commerce, 260 So. 2d 233, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 264 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1972)). Accordingly, I would affirm the order. . Contrary to the majority’s assertion, the dissent has not read section 443.091(2) in the disjunctive. Maj. op. at 256. The dissent reiterates the statutory language providing that a claimant mu…
• Sandra Fashions, Inc. v. Doyle, 389 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …s work. She did return to work the following Monday. Unemployment compensation laws are remedial and humanitarian, and they should be liberally and broadly construed. Williams v. State Dept. of Commerce, 260 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 264 So. 2d 427 (1972). Doyle’s one day delay in returning to work seems no more egregious or “non-compelling” than the painter who thought it was going to rain and helped his friend move to Georgia instead of going to work. Williams. In this case, unlike Williams,…

Authorities Cited

• Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Buckmaster, 256 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)