A. H. HOLT
v.
R. L. COWART

Fla. | 1940-01-23
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur., Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Wi-iitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
141 Fla. 646 Florida Supreme Court (1940) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 193 So. 860
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the record in this case fails to reveal any reversible error; therefore, the final decree entered by the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Wi-iitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rowland v. McCALL, 118 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
    …ces is applicable here. For cases upholding a chancellor’s findings as to the validity of a deed or gift under situations involving alleged confidential relationships and undue influence, see and compare Held v. Florida Conference Ass’n, etc., 1940, 141 Fla. 646, 193 So. 828; Adams v. Saunders, 1939, 139 Fla. 730, 191 So. 312; and Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Hutchinson, 1932, 107 Fla. 69, 144 So. 343. See also Marquette v. Hathaway, Fla. 1954, 76 So. 2d 648. We therefore uphold and affirm the decree. A…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw