IN THE INTEREST OF D. E. I., JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
IN THE INTEREST OF D. E. I., JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
264 So. 2d 857
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent because he was found to be in possession of a firearm. This appeal was duly prosecuted and urges insufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that the juvenile had possession of the firearm. With commendable candor, the State concedes the lack of evidence to show possession in the juvenile and confesses error. See: Lawson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 683.
We therefore dispense with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and reverse the adjudication determining the juvenile to be delinquent, with directions to discharge him from said proceeding.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cohen v. State, 303 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…or other merchandise at below market cost and then never received the merchandise or his money back was admissible as this evidence was introduced to establish a common scheme or design and therefore was relevant. See State v. Fisher, Fla.App.1972, 264 So. 2d 857. Thus, this argument of appellant must fail. Appellant secondly argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. [*389] After a review of the record, we conclude that there was competent substantial evidence contained therein to…
Authorities Cited
- Lawson v. State, 251 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)