TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MYRTLE PENDER AND EDWARD PENDER, HER HUSBAND, AND JAMES HARDY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Affirmed judgment awarding attorney's fees to insured in uninsured motorist claim where insurer failed to demand arbitration before trial court's cutoff date and thus waived any right to avoid fees.
An insurance company that fails to demand arbitration before the trial court's pre-trial conference deadline waives its right to assert arbitration as a defense to attorney's fees in an uninsured motorist claim.
[1] An insurance company waives its right to assert an arbitration defense to attorney's fees by failing to demand arbitration before the trial court's pre-trial conference d…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAn insured sued an insurance company on an uninsured motorist provision. The insurance company's policy contained an arbitration clause, but the compa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Uninsured Motorist Provision cases and more on FLexlaw
The primary question arising out of this suit by appellee, insured, against appellant, insurance company, on an uninsured motorist provision is the award of attorney’s fees to the insured. The insurance company contends that its policy of insurance provides for arbitration; that it did not deny liability, did not refuse to arbitrate, thus there was no necessity for the insured to institute suit and therefore he is not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under the statute. This record is devoid of any indication on the part of the insurance company that it demanded arbitration. During the pleading stage the trial court stated, “ . . . any rights to arbitration by either party are waived unless exercised prior to the date yet to be set of the Pre-Trial Conference”, and on the date the pre-trial order was entered the trial court found, “Neither party has asked for arbitration”. Under these facts the insurance company is not in a position to now assert any right of arbitration or nonliability for attorney’s fees for plaintiff. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Williams, 177 So.2d 47 (3 Fla.App.1965). The other points asserted by appellant have been carefully considered and found to be without merit. The judgment appealed is affirmed.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Corine Williams, 177 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)