ARCHIE ORICE BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cone v. State, 285 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1973)
  …PER CURIAM. We review on conflict certiorari the per curiam without opinion decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, in the case of Cone v. State, 265 So. 2d 108. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in imposing upon defendants herein separate concurrent sentences (1) for the offense of armed robbery (life imprisonment) and (2) for the offense of displaying or using a firearm during the c…
• Horton Miles v. State, 303 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …nforcement officer were not sufficient to render involuntary the confession made by appellant after proper Miranda warnings. Appellant further urges that the two sentences violate the “single transaction rule.” In Cone v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 265 So. 2d 108, this Court by a “PCA” opinion affirmed separate sentences for robbery and for the offense of displaying or using a firearm during the commission of the robbery. On certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida (Cone v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1973, 285 So.…