WATSON
v.
COAKLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS
WATSON
COAKLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS
568 U.S. 1071
Supreme Court of the United States (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peterson v. State, 221 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 2017)…the guilt phase and also deny Peterson’s separate habeas petition. .However, because Peterson’s jury recommended death by a vote of seven to five and his sentence became final in 2012, see Peterson v. State, 94 So. 3d 514, 523 (Fla.), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1071, 133 S.Ct. 793, 184 L.Ed.2d 586 (2012), Peterson is entitled to a new penalty phase under Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, No. 16-998, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (U.S. May 22, 2017). See Mosley v. State…