DENNIS ROBINSON, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1971-12-16
No. 71-412
HOBSON, J., concurs., MANN, J., concurs specially.
265 So. 2d 553 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Dennis Robinson petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging illegal incarceration, claiming he was never informed of his right to appeal. The Florida Supreme Court found a prima facie case for relief and transferred the matter to this appellate court, which appointed a circuit judge as commissioner to take testimony and make findings on the factual issues presented.


Holding

The court determined that Robinson established a prima facie case for relief based on the trial court's failure to inform him of his appellate rights, and remanded the case to a circuit court commissioner to develop a full factual record through testimony and evidence before making a final determination on the habeas petition.


Headnotes

[1] A prima facie case for relief in a habeas corpus petition may be established by evidence that a petitioner was not informed of their right to appeal a judgment and senten…

[2] A court may transfer a habeas corpus petition to another court for further factual inquiry and determination of appropriate relief.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the transcript of the proceedings revealed without contradiction that at no time was petitioner, informed by the trial court that he had a right to appeal the judgment and sentence entered against him”

Establishes the factual basis for the prima facie case for relief - the trial court's failure to inform the petitioner of appellate rights.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Robinson was convicted and sentenced, but the trial court transcript revealed without contradiction that he was never informed by the trial court of h…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Chief Judge.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

In this case petitioner Dennis Robinson on February 5, 1971 filed his petition originally in the Supreme Court for a writ of ha-beas corpus, alleging his illegal incarceration by respondent Wainwright as the legal custodian of State Prisoners. On March 24, 1971, the Supreme Court issued opinion and orcler, 245 So.2d 867, reciting that “the transcript of the proceedings revealed without contradiction that at no time was petitioner, informed by the trial court that he had a right to appeal the judgment and sentence entered against him”, that “under the facts before us, it would appear that petitioner has made out a prima facie case for relief . . .”, and the cause was thereupon transferred to this Court to permit us to make inquiry into the matters set forth in the petition for the writ “and grant such relief as it may deem appropriate, including the appointment of a commissioner to make further findings of fact”.

Therefore, in accordance with the order and opinion of the Supreme Court, this cause is hereby referred to Hon. William K. Love, Judge of the Circuit Court of the 10th Judicial Circuit in and for Polk County, Florida, with directions to take testimony and receive evidence as to the factual matters put in issue by the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Response thereto, and to make his findings and recommendations thereon, and to file said transcribed report, findings, and recommendations to this Court in this cause in due course.

In furtherance hereof the Clerk of this Court is directed to transmit the entire record in this cause to the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the 10th Judicial Circuit for delivery by him to Judge Love. Said record, together with such other documents as may be filed before Judge Love in connection with his hearing will be thereupon returned to the Clerk of this Court for final consideration and determination of this cause.

The Attorney General’s motion filed herein on July 13, 1971, to' strike certain portions of the Reply Brief of petitioner theretofore filed herein is granted insofar as any discrepancies appear therein with the authenticated transcript of record of the trial Court proceedings referred to in said motion to strike.

Judge Love, as commissioner for this Court, is hereby authorized to appoint counsel for petitioner Robinson and subpoena such witnesses as he or his counsel may in good faith desire. Judge Love to be the sole judge of the reasonableness of such request; all at the expense of Polk County.

So ordered.

HOBSON, J., concurs.

MANN, J., concurs specially.

MANN, Judge

(concurring specially).

I agree that the defendant is entitled to delayed review under Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239, but that such review must inevitably result in affirmance. This is so because the record submitted to us shows conclusively that the plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. See Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446. Consequently, I would grant the writ and dismiss the appeal on the court’s own motion as frivolous.

Concurrence
MANN, Judge

MANN, Judge

(concurring specially).

I agree that the defendant is entitled to delayed review under Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So. 2d 239, but that such review must inevitably result in affirmance. This is so because the record submitted to us shows conclusively that the plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. See Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 446. Consequently, I would grant the writ and dismiss the appeal on the court’s own motion as frivolous.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw