CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID SPICY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-08-08
No. 71-1276
Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
266 So. 2d 101 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The City of Miami appeals a $5,000 jury verdict for false imprisonment in favor of the estate of Alton Jimmie Exson. The court reversed, holding that the arresting officer had substantial reason to believe Exson was committing the misdemeanor of drunkenness, making the arrest lawful and the city not liable.


Holding

The court held that the officer had substantial reason to believe Exson was committing the misdemeanor of drunkenness based on the observed symptoms, and therefore the arrest was lawful. The city is not liable for false imprisonment, and a directed verdict should have been entered for the defendant city.


Headnotes

[1] An arrest for a misdemeanor committed in an officer's presence is lawful if the officer has substantial reason to believe the person is committing the offense, and courts…

[2] Evidence is insufficient to sustain a verdict of liability against a city for false imprisonment when the arresting officer had substantial reason to believe the individu…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“In considering the legality of an arrest by a municipal officer for a breach of the peace committed in his presence, the determining factor is not whether the charged person is actually guilty. The question to be determined is whether or not the officer had substantial reason to believe the plaintiff was committing a misdemeanor.”

Establishes the legal standard for evaluating arrest lawfulness—based on officer's reasonable belief, not actual guilt

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

On July 1, 1962, police officers found Alton Jimmie Exson in a dazed condition with a head injury and blood present. Although the officer detected no …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HENDRY, Judge.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellee-defendant, the City of Miami, seeks review of a $5,000.00 judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict in that amount, in favor of appellee David Spicy, successor administrator of the estate of Alton Jimmie Exson, in an action for false imprisonment brought under the survival statute.

The first administrator filed suit against Dade County, the City of Miami, and a physician working at Jackson Memorial Hospital, which is operated by the County. The county and the physician entered into a settlement with the plaintiff, leaving the city as the only defendant. The city’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part so that the issues became joined solely as to the allegations that the decedent was falsely imprisoned by a police officer, for which the city would be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

We express the view that City of Miami v. Albro, Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 23 is controlling, and that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the verdict of liability against the city.

*102On July 1, 1962, police officers found Alton Jimmie Exson in a dazed condition suffering from a head injury. The arresting officer testified that Exson acted drunk rather than injured, even though blood was on the seat of the taxicab and the sidewalk and the officer saw a cut at the back of Exson’s head. The officer did not detect any alcohol on his breath. The officer also explained that none of Exson’s co-workers would take him home. Therefore, Exson was taken into custody and transported by ambulance to Jackson Memorial Hospital for an examination. The officer filled out both an examination report and an arrest report for drunkenness.

The physician at the hospital conducted an examination which revealed a small laceration in the back of his head and a negative neurological indication. While being examined, Exson admitted to the physician that he had been drinking.

After the examination was completed, Exson was released to the police department and was taken to jail. The next day, his condition worsened, and he was returned to Jackson Memorial Hospital. He died on July 19, 1962. The autopsy report showed that deceased suffered multiple fractures of the skull and multiple contusions and lacerations.

In the Albro case, supra, at p. 26, the court stated:

“In considering the legality of an arrest by a municipal officer for a breach of the peace committed in his presence, the determining factor is not whether the charged person is actually guilty. The question to be determined is whether or not the officer had substantial reason to believe the plaintiff was committing a misdemeanor. If substantial reason exists the courts cannot second guess the officer in the performance of his duty. In the instant case the cause was not submitted to the jury upon the issue of whether the officer used excessive force but on the issue of whether the plaintiff committed an offense.”

The officer observed Exson in a dazed, incoherent condition with glassy eyes, and suffering from a cut. The officer described him as being drunk, even though he smelled no alcohol on Exson’s breath, and placed him under arrest. The officer sent Exson to the hospital for examination, which examination disclosed no severe injuries and during which time Exson admitted drinking. Drunkenness, for which Ex-son was placed under arrest, was a misdemeanor under § 856.01, Fla.Stat.1959, F.S. A., (which was identical to the present statute before its repeal by 1971 Laws of Florida, Ch. 71-132, § 17, to be effective July 1, 1973) and the predecessor municipal ordinance sections of the City of Miami Code §§ 38-13 and 38-50. Under the circumstances reasonable men could not differ that the police officer acted reasonably. Thus, the lower court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant.

Therefore, the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded with directions to enter a verdict for the defendant city.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spicy v. City OF Miami, 280 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1973)
    …DEKLE, Justice. Conflict as a basis for review on certio-rari became apparent upon a close consideration of the factual situation appearing on the face of the Third District Court’s opinion at 266 So. 2d 101 (1972), reversing a resolution of those facts by a jury. Our quashal of a similar substitution of factual judgment by the Third District in Westerman v. Shell’s City, Inc., 265 So. 2d 43 [*420] (Fla.1972), and the holding in Golden Hills Turf and…
    1 / 2
  • City OF Miami v. Spicy, 284 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 8, 1972 (266 So. 2d 101) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 27, 1973 (280 So.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw