CHASE CARMEN HUNTER, PETITIONER,

v.

EXECUTIVES, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. Jacobs, 134 S. Ct. 584 (U.S. 2013)
  …stay during the pendency of the state-court action. Id., at 869. We granted certiorari to decide whether, consistent with our delineation of cases encompassed by the Younger doctrine, abstention was appropriate here. 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1805, 185 L.Ed.2d 810 (2013).5 II A Neither party has questioned the District Court's jurisdiction to decide whether federal law preempted the IUB's decision, and rightly so. In Verizon Md. Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Md., 535 U.S. 635, 122 S.Ct. 1753, 152 L.Ed.2d…
• Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 134 S. Ct. 604 (U.S. 2013)
  …her claim more than three years after that date, her action was time barred. We granted certiorari to resolve a split among the Courts of Appeals on the enforceability of this common contractual limitations provision. 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1802, 185 L.Ed.2d 810 (2013). Compare, e.g., Burke, supra, at 79-81 (plan provision requiring suit within [*105] three years after proof-of-loss deadline is enforceable); and Rice v. Jefferson Pilot Financial Ins. Co., 578 F. 3d 450, 455-456 (C.A.6 2009) (same), with Whi…

  ← 1 / 2 →