ALAN KACHALSKY, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
SUSAN CACACE, ET AL.
ALAN KACHALSKY, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
SUSAN CACACE, ET AL.
569 U.S. 918
Supreme Court of the United States (2013)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 185 L. Ed. 2d 812 · 133 S. Ct. 1806
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Casey, 741 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2014)…sue as a beneficial owner.” Moran, 827 F. 2d at 183 (citing cases); see Kernel Records Oy v. Mosley, 694 F. 3d 1294, 1303 n. 9 (11th Cir.2012) (“[P]reeedent ... under the 1909 Copyright Act is instructive.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1810, 185 L.Ed.2d 812 (2013). Were we to ignore the weight of this authority and hold otherwise, redundant registrations would be necessary for statutory standing purposes every time legal and beneficial ownership of the same exclusive right rested with two distinct pa…
-
Peruta v. California, 137 S. Ct. 1995 (U.S. 2017)
-
Lakeland Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Astellas US, LLC, 763 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2014)…l tying and the district court, therefore, did not abuse its discretion in denying the Medical Center’s request to certify a class for the damages claim, see Ault v. Walt Disney World Co., 692 F. 3d 1212, 1216 (11th Cir.2012), cert denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1806, 185 L.Ed.2d 812 (2013). II. The district court also did not abuse its discretion in refusing to certify the class for purposes of seeking injunctive and declaratory relief The direct purchaser rule does not apply to claims for injunctive and decla…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence