HENRIETTA FURMANIK, APPELLANT,
v.
NORTHEAST AIRLINES, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that filed and approved tariff regulations can limit an airline's liability, even in cases of negligence.
Plaintiff's greyhound racing dogs died from suffocation due to a delay in takeoff. The dogs were shipped under a 'no value declared' airbill, and the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Declared Value cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant, plaintiff, below, appeals from the entry of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant airline. The action was based on the death of two greyhound racing dogs; negligence and breach of contract were alleged.
Due to a delay in take off from the airport both dogs suffocated. They had been shipped, and appropriate payment made under a “no value declared” airbill. The plaintiff took the position that contracts relieving a carrier from liability caused by its negligence were void as a matter of public policy.
The defendant asserted that regardless of the question of negligence the tariff schedule limited the liability to a specified amount under the regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board. With this we agree and affirm the entry of the summary judgment by the lower court.
It is our view that we are not dealing with the question of relieving the carrier from liability but with the question of whether the carrier’s liability may be limited by filed and approved tariff regulations.
“Under the tariff provisions, it was plaintiff’s duty to declare the higher rate if she wished protection in excess of the limited amount. Vogelsang v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 193 F.Supp. 613 (S.D.N.Y.1961), affirmed 302 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1962) ; Milhizer v. Riddle Airlines, Inc., [185 F.Supp. 110 (E. D. Mich., S.D. I960)]; Melnick v. National Air Lines, [189 Pa.Super. 316, 150 A.2d 566 (1959)]; Wilkes v. Braniff Airways, Inc. [288 P.2d 377 (Okl.1955)]; Jones v. Northwest Airlines, 22 Wash.2d 863, 157 P.2d 728 (1945); Radinsky v. Western Air Lines, Inc., 125 Colo. 286, 242 P.2d 815 (1952).” Eastern Air Lines v. Williams, 282 Ala. 421, 211 So.2d 912, 915 (1968).
“Tariffs filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board, if valid, are conclusive and exclusive, and the rights and liabilities between airlines and their passengers are governed thereby.” Slick Airways, Inc. v. United States, 292 F.2d 515, 154 Ct.Cl. 417.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Life Scis., Inc. v. Emery AIR Freight Corp., 341 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…air carrier with the CAB. There have also been a number of cases in which the courts have sustained rules in air carrier tariffs which limit the amount which is recoverable for lost or damaged property. E. g., Furmanik v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 266 So. 2d 352 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Vogelsang v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 302 F. 2d 709 (2d Cir. 1962); Randolph v. American Airlines, 103 Ohio App. 172, 144 N.E. 2d 878 (1956). If an air carrier can validly limit the value of property damage claims to be filed agains…
-
Klicker v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 563 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir. 1977)…2d at 209-11 (holding Rule 345 void in case involving death of a dog); Odom v. Pacific Northern Airlines, Inc., supra, 393 P. 2d at 116-17 (adopting Judge Frank’s dissent). But see contra Furmanik v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1972) 266 So. 2d 352 (death of dog). . See House Rep.No.2360, 85th Cong.2d Sess. (1958), in 1958 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, pp. 3741, 3758 (the foregoing section was adopted intact from the Civil Aeronautics Act, with no intended effect on prior law). . As the CAB p…
Authorities Cited
- Slick Airways, Inc. v. United States, 292 F.2d 515 (Ct. Cl. 1961)
- Vogelsang v. DELTA AIR Lines, Inc., 302 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1962)