PAUL M. HENDERSON, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF POLK COUNTY,

v.

STATE EX REL. C. GERCKEN

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Burkhart v. Cir. Court of the Eleventh Jud. Cir. of Fla., 146 Fla. 457 (Fla. 1941)
  …thorized by law for its seizure and sale. The judg1 ment here challenged on constructive service against the non-resident Burkhart is a judgment in rem on his property situated within the jurisdiction of the court. See Newton v. (Bryan, 142 Fla. 14, 194 So. 282. The law does not require notice prior to the entry of a sequestration order similar to the one questioned, but the notice of the sale of said property thereunder is sufficient. See Geary v. Geary, 272 N. Y. 390, 6 N. E. (2d) 67, 108 A. L. 1923, and…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Grammer v. Roman, 174 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …usively in the Circuit Court of Brevard County. Thus this proceeding, although in the form of a personal action, is in fact only a proceeding quasi in rem operating only upon the property or some interest therein. Newton v. Bryan, 1940, 142 Fla. 14, 194 So. 282; Matz v. O’Connell, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 705. The above is not inconsistent with our holding in McMullen v. McMullen, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 626, to the effect that an action by vendors for specific performance of vendee’s argreement to buy r…
• Dov Gelkop v. Gelkop, 384 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …urisdiction; it may not, however, enforce such provisions in personam by contempt proceedings, as here, or by the entry of a money judgment against the respondent. Peacock v. Peacock, 160 Fla. 630, 36 So. 2d 206 (1948); Newton v. Bryan, 142 Fla. 14, 194 So. 282 (1940); Wood v. Wood, 276 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). It, therefore, follows that the above-discussed provisions of the final judgment herein were validly entered as the trial court had jurisdiction to do so by virtue of the properly perfected c…