DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES, PETITIONER,

v.

INDIANA.

Citator

Cited By

• Foster v. State, 132 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2013)
  …59 So. 2d 239, 241 (Fla.1995) (same). More recently, we held that the movant must at least allege facts establishing a prima facie basis for prejudice. See Hampton v. State, 103 So. 3d 98, 112-13 (Fla.2012), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 133 S.Ct. 2027, 185 L.Ed.2d 892 (2013). In Hampton, we reiterated that the complaining party must establish “not only that the non-disclosed matter was ‘relevant’ ... but also that it is ‘material to jury service in the case.’” Hampton, 103 So. 3d at 112 (quoting Roberts v. Teja…
• Victorino v. State, 127 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2013)
  …fy its exclusion as evidence; rather, a relevant photograph must be unfairly prejudicial to be excluded.” Hampton v. State, 103 So. 3d 98, 115 (Fla.2012) (citing Sexton v. State, 697 So. 2d 833, 837 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2027, 185 L.Ed.2d 892 (2013)). Accordingly, “just because a photograph is gruesome does not make the photograph inadmissible.” Id. “This Court has upheld the admission of [gruesome] photographs when they [were] offered to explain a medical examiner’s testimony, the mann…