ARMSTRONG GROCER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
SMITH-ALFORD SIGN SERVICE, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GARNISHEE

Fla. | 1931-02-05
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.
101 Fla. 668 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment in ¡ this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Tyler vs. Akerman, et al., 85 Fla. 185, 96 Sou. 838, and cases there cited. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Alton M. Ake v. Chancey, 152 Fla. 677 (Fla. 1943)
    …al claim. It cannot apply where the amount claimed is unliquidated, is in dispute, or is uncertain. It is likewise invalid as against a municipality. Tyler v. Akerman, 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838; Armstrong Grocery Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service Inc., 101 Fla. 668, 132 So. 696. The pertinent part of the contract shows that it was entered into between appellee and Rorick for Spitzer Rorick Trust and Savings Bank and other non-resident bond and coupon holders for the performance of professional services as her…
  • Bailey v. Theodora M. Baron, 269 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …l claim. It cannot apply where the amount claimed is unliqui-dated, is in dispute, or is uncertain. It is likewise invalid as against a municipality. Tyler v. Akerman, 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838; Armstrong Grocer Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service, Inc., 101 Fla. 668, 132 So. 696.” ** City of Miami Ordinance No. 6558, creates the Miami Police Relief and Pension Fund. This ordinance, promulgated pursuant to Fla.Stat. Chapter 185, F.S.A., provides in Section 14 as follows: “Section 14 — Benefits: Sub-Section B…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw