JUSTUS CORNELIUS ROSEMOND, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2013-05-28
No. 12–895.
569 U.S. 1003 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 191 · 133 S. Ct. 2734
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Justus C. Rosemond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1240 (U.S. 2014)
    …underlying crime and "knew [his confederate] was carrying [a] firearm"). And the Court of Appeals held that Rosemond had presented no sufficient reason for departing from that precedent. See 695 F.3d, at 1156. We granted certiorari, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2734, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013), to resolve the Circuit conflict over what it takes to aid and abet a § 924(c) offense. Although we disagree with Rosemond's principal arguments, we find that the trial court erred in instructing the jury. We therefore vacate…
  • …nt noting that after the Fifth Circuit's decision in Caldwell, three Courts of Appeals had deemed similar lawsuits not to be mass actions removable under CAFA.4 We granted certiorari to resolve this split of authority, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2736, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013), and now reverse. II A Our analysis begins with the statutory text. Sebelius v. Cloer, 569 U.S. ----, ----, 133 S.Ct. 1886, 1892-1893, 185 L.Ed.2d 1003 (2013). The statute provides: "[T]he term mass action means any civil action (except a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw