MISSISSIPPI, EX REL. JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PETITIONER,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.
MISSISSIPPI, EX REL. JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PETITIONER,
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.
569 U.S. 1003
Supreme Court of the United States (2013)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 191 · 133 S. Ct. 2736
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Justus C. Rosemond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1240 (U.S. 2014)
-
Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood v. Au Optronics Corp., 134 S. Ct. 736 (U.S. 2014)…ed in the judgment noting that after the Fifth Circuit's decision in Caldwell, three Courts of Appeals had deemed similar lawsuits not to be mass actions removable under CAFA.4 We granted certiorari to resolve this split of authority, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2736, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013), and now reverse. II A Our analysis begins with the statutory text. Sebelius v. Cloer, 569 U.S. ----, ----, 133 S.Ct. 1886, 1892-1893, 185 L.Ed.2d 1003 (2013). The statute provides: "[T]he term mass action means any civil…