RAY DANSBY, PETITIONER,
v.
RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION.

U.S. | 2013-06-03
No. 12–8582.
569 U.S. 1015 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 215 · 133 S. Ct. 2767
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Apel., 134 S. Ct. 1144 (U.S. 2014)
    …ound that the easement through Vandenberg deprived the Government of exclusive possession of the roadway, so it concluded [*366] that § 1382 does not cover the portion of the Base where Apel's protest occurred. We granted certiorari, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2767, 186 L.Ed.2d 218 (2013), and now vacate the judgment. II Section 1382 provides in full: "Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or inst…
  • Ayestas v. Lorie Davis, 138 S. Ct. 1080 (U.S. 2018)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw