WILLIAM VAN POYCK, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA.

U.S. | 2013-06-12
Nos. 12–10696, 12A1184.
569 U.S. 1040 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 881 · 133 S. Ct. 2823
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hendrix v. State, 136 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2014)
    …rix, 908 So. 2d at 428. Claims raised and rejected in prior postconviction proceedings are procedurally barred from being relitigated in a successive motion. See Van Poyck v. State, 116 So. 3d 347, 362 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2823, 186 L.Ed.2d 881 (2013). Accordingly, the circuit court properly found these claims procedurally barred. C. Brady Third, Hendrix argues that the State committed a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by withholding imp…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw