FLORENCE V. COWDERY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
G. H. BYARS, APPELLEE
FLORENCE V. COWDERY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
G. H. BYARS, APPELLEE
101 Fla. 668
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, *669considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alton M. Ake v. Chancey, 152 Fla. 677 (Fla. 1943)…al claim. It cannot apply where the amount claimed is unliquidated, is in dispute, or is uncertain. It is likewise invalid as against a municipality. Tyler v. Akerman, 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838; Armstrong Grocery Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service Inc., 101 Fla. 668, 132 So. 696. The pertinent part of the contract shows that it was entered into between appellee and Rorick for Spitzer Rorick Trust and Savings Bank and other non-resident bond and coupon holders for the performance of professional services as her…
-
Bailey v. Theodora M. Baron, 269 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…l claim. It cannot apply where the amount claimed is unliqui-dated, is in dispute, or is uncertain. It is likewise invalid as against a municipality. Tyler v. Akerman, 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838; Armstrong Grocer Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service, Inc., 101 Fla. 668, 132 So. 696.” ** City of Miami Ordinance No. 6558, creates the Miami Police Relief and Pension Fund. This ordinance, promulgated pursuant to Fla.Stat. Chapter 185, F.S.A., provides in Section 14 as follows: “Section 14 — Benefits: Sub-Section B…