DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES, ET AL.

U.S. | 2013-06-27
No. 12–8561.
570 U.S. 931 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 932 · 133 S. Ct. 2886
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Doyle Randall Paroline v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1710 (U.S. 2014)
    …2) (en banc). Paroline sought review here. Certiorari was granted to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals over the proper causation inquiry for purposes of determining the entitlement to and amount of restitution under § 2259. 570 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2886, 186 L.Ed.2d 932 (2013). For the reasons set forth, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. II Title 18 U.S.C. § 2259(a) provides that a district court "shall order restitution for any offense" under Chapter 110 of Title 18, which covers…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw