HIGHMARK INC., PETITIONER,

v.

ALLCARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Castleman., 134 S. Ct. 1405 (U.S. 2014)
  …aracterized by the application of any physical force"), with United States v. Belless, 338 F.3d 1063, 1068 (C.A.9 2003) (§ 922(g)(9) covers only "the violent use of force"). We granted certiorari to resolve this split, 570 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 49, 186 L.Ed.2d 962 (2013), and now reverse the Sixth Circuit's judgment. II A "It is a settled principle of interpretation that, absent other indication, 'Congress intends to incorporate the well-settled meaning of the common-law terms it uses.' " Sekhar v. United Sta…
• Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1749 (U.S. 2014)
• Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1962 (U.S. 2014)
  …granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on the application of the equitable defense of laches to copyright infringement claims brought within the three-year look-back period prescribed by Congress.12 570 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 50, 186 L.Ed.2d 962 (2013). [*677] III We consider first whether, as the Ninth Circuit held, laches may be invoked [*1973] as a bar to Petrella's pursuit of legal remedies under 17 U.S.C. § 504(b). The Ninth Circuit erred, we hold, in failing to recognize that the c…