JULIE HEIMESHOFF, PETITIONER,
v.
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., ET AL.

U.S. | 2013-10-01
No. 12–729.
134 S. Ct. 50 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 961 · 570 U.S. 947 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3177
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Navarette v. California., 134 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2014)
    …rted driving that was sufficiently dangerous to merit an investigative stop without waiting for the officer to observe additional reckless driving himself. Id., at *9. The California Supreme Court denied review. We granted certiorari, 570 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 50, 186 L.Ed.2d 963 (2013), and now affirm. II The Fourth Amendment permits brief investigative stops-such as the traffic stop in this case-when a law enforcement officer has "a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person…
  • Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1962 (U.S. 2014)
    …d]." Ibid. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on the application of the equitable defense of laches to copyright infringement claims brought within the three-year look-back period prescribed by Congress.12 570 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 50, 186 L.Ed.2d 962 (2013). [*677] III We consider first whether, as the Ninth Circuit held, laches may be invoked [*1973] as a bar to Petrella's pursuit of legal remedies under 17 U.S.C. § 504(b). The Ninth Circuit erred, we hold, in failing to rec…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw