NATHAN S. BERKMAN, PETITIONER,
v.
INDIANA.

U.S. | 2013-10-07
No. 12–10691.
134 S. Ct. 155 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 187 L. Ed. 2d 109 · 571 U.S. 863 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3182
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Zack v. State, 228 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 2017)
    …en banc opinion, affirmed the dismissal of many of the claims in the habeas petition as untimely. Zack v. Tucker, 704 F. 3d 917 (11th Cir. 2013). The Supreme Court denied certiorari review on October 7, 2013. Zack v. Crews, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 156, 187 L.Ed.2d 109 (2013). On May 26, 2015, Zack filed a secohd successive postconviction motion raising a claim of intellectual disability based on Hall v. Florida, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1986, 188 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2014). The trial court summarily denied the motion on Jul…
  • Lugo v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 750 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 2014)
    …Dept. of Corr., 537 F. 3d 1282 (11th Cir.2007) (per curiam). 24. Michael Zack v. Tucker, 704 F. 3d 917 (11th Cir.2013) (en banc) (finding all claims except one claim to be time barred), cert. denied sub nom., Zack v. Crews, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 156, 187 L.Ed.2d 109 (2013). Florida capital defendants who filed § 2254 habeas petitions which were untimely and qualified for equitable tolling: 25. Mark Asay v. McNeil, No. 3:05-ev-147, 2009 WL 9081403 (M.D.Fla. Feb. 10, 2009), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1007, 130 S.Ct…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw