MICHAEL PETITE, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• McCARTHAN v. Warden, FCI Estill, 811 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …rden of objecting to a district court’s decision not to rely on certain of a defendant’s ACCA-qualify-ing convictions at sentencing to impose an ACCA enhancement. United States v. Petite, 703 F. 3d 1290, 1292 n. 2 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 182, 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013). If the government fails to object to the district court’s decision to rely on fewer than all ACCA-qualifying convictions, it waives any argument that a sentencing court’s imposition of an ACCA enhancement is justified on t…
• Kap Sun Butka v. U.S. Attorney General, 827 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …. 3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); (10) Belay-Gebru v. INS, 327 F. 3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003). court could have, but did not, rely on at sentencing. See United States v. Petite, 703 F. 3d 1290, 1292 n. 2 (11th Cir. 2013) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S. Ct. 182, 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013); Bryant v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium, 738 F. 3d 1253, 1279 (11th Cir. 2013). And "[w]e cannot know at this point whether the government will choose to invoke [such an argument] in this case or decide to waive it, and we see…
• United States v. Kirk, 767 F.3d 1136 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …quires courts to use a “categorical approach” and a “comparative inquiry” to determine whether a crime qualifies as a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause. United States v. Petite, 703 F. 3d 1290, 1294 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 182, 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013). Using the categorical approach, the central inquiry is whether the offense presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another comparable to the risk posed by the ACCA’s enumerated crimes.... [A] crime involves…